The purpose of this longish post is to illustrate that a bridge exists between Wicca and Traditional and Apostolic Gnosticism by way of Thelema-as-Gnostic-revival.
Some terms: (all of which are by necessity gross and incomplete generalizations, forgive me).
Witchcraft is a practical, magical religious philosophy that is Gnostic in essence though not in origin. Its tenets are animism (an inherent soul in all things), and the use of intuitive states to communicate and interact with this soul, often for practical purposes (healing, fertility, success). These states are accessed via poetry, myth, and psychodrama.
Gnosticism is a pre-Christian syncretic religion which combines Roman, Kemetic (Egyptian), Hellenic and Judaic themes and philosophy. Its central tenet is that the liberating experience of knowing oneself profoundly and intuitively - gnosis - is essential in knowing and experiencing the Divine. Its central rite is the Eucharist, which is the manifestation of incarnate Divinity in the form of Mithras/Dionysis, Wasir/Heru (Osiris/Horus) and the Logos/Christ. While much of Gnosticism resembles Christianity aesthetically and structurally (particularly since the Gnostic Revival of the 19th Century), it is an older and distinct religion in its own right.
Thelema is a 20th Century religion drawing from Rabelaisian philosophy ("Do what thou Wilt") and Kemetic aesthetics. Its central document is a prose poem written in a trance state in 1904 by Aleister Crowley. Also Gnostic in essence, Thelema demands its adherents discover their true nature and maintain its integrity in all things. Its central rite is the 1913 Gnostic Mass, a re-envisioning of the Eucharist. Thelema had originally three main organizations: A masonic (some would argue pseudo-Masonic) fraternity, the OTO (which predated Thelema but a majority of Lodges chose to embrace the new religion); a more public Church, the Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (at least those congregations of the pre-existing EGC which chose to proceed along Thelemic lines) and the A.'.A.'., an initiatory system of meditation and alchemy with a strongly Buddhistic and Kabalistic orientation.
Wicca is a 20th Century agrarian/folkloric religion with central themes of the sacred environment and the Divine Feminine. It was conceived in its entirety by Gerald Gardner, who originally gave it the trappings of nudism, Co-Masonry, and practical occultism, along with the nostalgic aesthetic of Witchcraft by way of Shakespeare, Goya, Grimm, and the medieval Inquisitors. It is distinct from Witchcraft in that Wicca is specific "operational envelope" while Witchcraft is more general, and free of Wicca's presumptive histories and hierarchies.
[While I personally find the modern Wiccan aesthetic disingenuous (pretentious magical names, the disrespectful pillaging of myriad cultures, and irresponsible historical revisionism) this is not to imply at all that there is not genuine religious experience to be had there. I respect the sincere efforts of Wiccans to work toward personal and planetary enlightenment.[
Many Wiccans will take serious issue with the above definition, having read repeatedly that Wicca is a surviving pan-European megalithic Goddess cult, the word having Teutonic origins. This understanding is in its entirety a fiction.
Most Wiccans have heard the "rumour" that Gerald Gardner employed Aleister Crowley to create rituals for a new, populist occult religion - and that these rumours have been thoroughly discounted. Readers will encounter how Gardner met Crowley at the end of his life in 1947, when he was enfeebled by drug addiction and old age, and that their meeting was an unique, casual introduction. Such dismissals are likewise false. The facts bear out the assertion that;
- While some ancestral trappings of pre-Christian Europe survived through the centuries (maypoles, superstitions, folk dances, nursery rhymes) these cannot be said to constitute a religion. There is no evidence whatsoever of a magical Goddess religion being practiced in England before Gardner and after the Christianization of Europe.
- Evidence supports that Gardner and Crowley knew each other as early as 1936
- Gardner was a member of the OTO and had a charter from Crowley to initiate others into OTO
- Wicca was specifically invented by Gardner to popularize Thelemic Gnosticism (specifically the Gnostic Mass).
- Upon Crowley's death, Lady Freida Harris - the artist of the popular Thoth Tarot - understood Gardner (mistakenly) to be the head of the OTO in Europe. It was viewed by many within Crowley's circle that what Gardner was doing (Wicca) was merely an extension and performance of the Gnostic Mass.
- Gardner's Third Degree Initiation Ritual of the original Wicca is an exact copy of the Gnostic Mass
- The Charge of the Goddess used in all "Traditional" Wiccan groups is comprised verbatim of quotes from Crowley's Book of the Law
Bishop T Allen Greenfield has researched this issue extensively. A very long article here
- "My bottom line is that Wicca is not related historically in any way other than literary inspiration to any aboriginal pagan religion. It is, in fact, a product of the 1930s and 40s, hugely influenced by the rituals of Freemasonry, the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and the Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO). It, in fact, is a errant direct descendent of an OTO encampment in London chartered by Aleister Crowley and under direction of Crowley's direct student and would-be successor, Gerald Gardner. It is interesting to observe that Crowley's Acting Master of Agape Lodge OTO in America in the same period also wrote extensively a few years later on a "revival of witchcraft". [...]
"The only man I can think of who could have invented the rites," [Gardner] offers, "was the late Aleister Crowley....possibly he borrowed things from the cult writings, or more likely someone may have borrowed expressions from him.... " WITCHCRAFT TODAY (p 47) [...]
As we have seen, Wicca since Gardner's time has been watered down in many of its expressions into a kind of mushy white-light New Age, religion, with far less of the strong sexuality characteristic of Gardnerian Wicca, though, also, sometimes with less pretense as well. [...]
In introducing a goddess element into their theology, Crowley and Gardner both understood the yin/yang, male/female fundamental polarity of the universe. Radical feminist Neopagans have taken this balance and altered it, however unintentionally, into a political feminist agenda, centered around a near-monotheistic worship of the female principle, in a bizarre caricature of patriarchal Christianity.
So What?
Here's how I understand it.
- Many Wiccans I speak to have a common experience. A love of the sense of community, an honouring of the role of myth, imagination and play, a strong attraction to the role of the Divine Feminine - but a growing disaffection for paperback-populism and spice-rack-sisterhood of modern Wicca. Many also seek a deeper or more fully developed theology.
- Witchcraft, as it is exercised today in the context of Wicca is a deliberate expression of Gnosticism, via the Gnostic Revival Churches of the 19th Century, Theosophy, Thelema, and similar currents. Wiccans are already heirs to the legacy which many of them seek.
- As we Gnostics embrace Thelemites, Freemasons, Theosophists, Hermeticists, and Christians into our celebrations, so too must we make room and welcome for those from the Pagan community.
- Pagans/Neopagans/Wiccans tend largely to be from Catholic backgrounds and are at first extremely skeptical of Church work, which they identify with rigidity and authoritarianism. They should be invited to decode the Eucharist and the Orders from a mythic, almost Jungian perspective - as we do.
- Fundamentally, most Witches are very comfortable with the practical philosophies of Gnosticism - the honouring of the intuitive voice, the strong sense of personal responsibility, as well as specific Sophianic writings, such as Thunder, Perfect Mind.
- We do this NOT out of a desire to proselytize, and NOT out of a condemnation of deficiency in Wicca (or any other religion), but for the simple reason that many people are hungry for what we're doing. Many young people who find themselves to be looking for Gnosticism often explore Paganism first, as it is so much more accessible (and the book covers are cooler).
13 comments:
Interesting exegenesis on the origins of Wicca. I wasn't aware that it was so tightly tied to Crowley & Co. I must say, having had personal experience with some rather extreme Dianic wiccans, I'm quite inclined to agree with your assesment of the militant feminism found therein - it's like Fundementalism for the Ladies.
Anyways, excellent post.
Fnord. ;)
On a more personal note, the AJC is well known to the local Wicaan community and I have spoken and done a Ritual opening, in their 'Pagan Paths'weekly education meetings. I have been asked to return. Additionally, I will be co-blessing a 'Healing Chalice' with a neo-Pagan Priest friend, likely tonight. Building bridges. Ken+
Here's the facts, kids. According to dictionary.com, a "religion" is a sincerely held set of beliefs, part of a tradition and a way of life. Wicca fails on all three counts.
Sincerely held beliefs:
They aren't. Here's the facts. "Wiccans", "Neopagans" and such like, tend to be young, American and university educated. University educated people don't usually believe in things which are, on the face of them, absolutely untrue. The creation myths, cosmogonies and rituals of all pagan religions are all ludicrous. Earth Mothers, naked magick, Crow Spirits -- any attempt to look deeply into the content of the hotchpotch of half-baked fairy stories and horror movie cliches which make up the average pagan's belief system comes up against a flat wall of incredulity pretty quickly. Nobody of even average intelligence could possibly actually believe any of this to be literally true. Therefore, by syllogism, the vast majority of so-called "Wiccans" are not sincere in what they claim to believe.
This point is important, so it bears analysis. Not only are the beliefs of Wiccans ridiculous to the point of risibility, they're also provably fabricated and internally inconsistent. The entire religion of Wicca was created out of whole cloth in 1952 by a British Civil Servant called Gerald Gardner. Therefore, for example, the First Church of Jesus Christ, Elvis are on a more solid footing than the Wiccans, given that Elvis is both older and more historically real than anything in Wicca. And, furthermore, every half-educated Wiccan knows that this is the case.
It gets better. When Gardner invented neopaganism, he just put it together from all the bits he liked from the Penguin Library of Mythology. So Wicca has bits of Northern Italian folklore, bits of the Magick of Aleister Crowley (mainly Jewish mysticism), bits of Greek elemental symbolism (Thales, 500BC) and the whole thing suffused with a miasma of "Celtic" imagery, referring to a gang of Austrian savages who ended up in Galicia, with no culture, only the most extremely dubious historical provenance and the most tenuous of connections to the people who walk round calling each other "Celts" today. Plus a load of ritual nudity which was very certainly never in the originals. It says something that Scientology and Wicca were invented at roughly the same time; while the American Hubbard came up with a money-making machine that has a proven record of effecting miracle narcotics addiction cures, the best the Brits could come up with was a Carry on Camping version of the Bacchanalia we all learn in third year Latin.
Not only that, but the main creed of the "neopagan" movement is "An it hurt none, do as you will", which plagiarises Crowley, smuggles a bit of Chaucerian Middle English into a supposedly pre-Christian tradition and directly contradicts the two things we know for certain about the actually existing pagans; a) that they had many ritual taboos, so they didn't think "do as you will" and b) that they didn't care about hurting people. It is no exaggeration to say that the main works of Celtic literature are almost entirely concerned with the subject of killing other people and stealing their cows. When they don't deal with the equally mystical and spiritual subject of getting drunk and waking up in a ditch.
A tradition
Put it this way. Nobody was brought up Wiccan. Nobody had their children named at a "blooding ceremony" straight after the "hand-fasting", nobody took their children to campfires instead of Sunday School and nobody sat up night after night teaching their little ones enough Chaucer to give them a hope of understanding what "an you hurt none" means. Or if they did, then the social services intervened pretty quickly and quite right too. Unlike the Christian, Jewish, Hindu and Muslim religions, there is nobody whose neopagan "beliefs" locate them in a long line of believers starting with their parents, and their parents' parents.
Of course there isn't. Simply to pose the possibility is to see it as ridiculous. People don't become Wiccans in order to carry on the beliefs of their parents. People become Wiccans in order to offend their parents, to try to extract some revenge on Mum and Dad for the terrible crime of having financially supported them for all of their fourteen years of life. There have never been and will never be any second-generation Wiccans, because there is simply no point in being a Wiccan if it isn't going to wind up Ma and Pa. The pagan "tradition" is the actual antithesis of a tradition. Which is why telling a Wiccan to stop wearing his severed rabbit head or his inverted pentagram is absolutely nothing like removing the cross from a Christian school or depriving a Jew of his Star of David. One of these things is to strip a human being of his identity, to remove the very essence of what is important about his humanity. The other is just to tell a silly little child (of whatever age) not to bare his bottom in public.
Way of Life
Wiccanism, like the organised simper which goes in the West by the name of "Buddhism", is a religion which, unusually, makes no practical demands whatever on its adherents. A Wiccan doesn't go to hell if they are stopped from making silly hand signs at the customers in McDonalds, in the way that a Muslim can sincerely believe himself to be in danger of if provision is not made for him to make Umrah. Suited to the intellectually flabby, scruffy, lazy slacker teenagers who believe in it, Wicca is not a religion which gives a code by which to live one's life. It has no observances, fasts or obligations to charity. All it is, is a style of dress, a calculated giving of offense to Christians, and the occasional excuse for a booze-up for people too dull or inhibited to be able to open a bottle of whisky without turning it into a piece of amateurish performance art. That's not a religion. It's a pose. And, of course, and not coincidentally, an excuse to ensure that there's no black people invited to your fraternity parties because they're not "Celtic" enough.
Gerald Gardner didn't 'invent' Wicca he was just the man that brought it into the public eye.
I've posted a fairly lengthy rebuttal to "the cardinal" on this issue as a post in and of itself.
And, Anonymous, "Gerald Gardner didn't 'invent' Wicca"... If you would read Bishop Greenfield's article, you would come to realize that yes, Gardner did exactly that.
In Gnosis,
Jordan
As a Wiccan, I appreciate your analysis, and share your concerns with the 'current condition' of the Wiccan movement. Many of us are working toward developing a deeper theology; and one of the ways we are doing this is by examining the various philosophies and traditions that Gardner combined to create this 'thing called Wicca'.
Although it is rarely mentioned in Wiccan sources, it's my belief that Gnostic philosophy has contributed much more to Wiccan belief than it is currently getting credit for. I have found your site to be a great 'leaping off' point for those looking for those Gnostic connections.
By the way, thank you for your responce to 'the Cardinal'. I don't know what sort of Wiccans He's been running into, but I'm pretty sure they do not represent the majority of us!
By the way...
it was the "His Dark Materials" trilogy - especially "The Amber Spyglass" - that really inspired my new interest is Gnosticism. I noticed you quoted "The Subtle Knife". Any more thoughts on the series?
and..
Are there any references you can suggest for one looking for more info on Sophianic Gnosticism specifically?
Thanks,
Dawn.
Interesting to find someone like you... I started out Christian, then discovered Wicca and thought "wow, this is it! this is what i've been searching for!". But THEN, on down the road, I started discovering much deeper beliefs (thanks to serendipity or synchronicity, maybe), and lo and behold there was Gnosticism. I have always believed deep down that I was a "natural" witch, but I no longer feel the need to label myself Wiccan. I have sense settled on the label "gnostic witch", so it is very interesting to find someone so like me in beliefs. Any suggestions on readings?
Hi Amber! Hope you are well. A gnostic witch, I like that! There are some brands of Witchcraft (as opposed to Wicca) that are "Luciferian Gnostic" in nature. "The Pillars of Tubal Cain" by Nigel Jackson and Michael Howard will shed some light on this tradition. As for me, I was quite inspired by Caitlin Matthews' "Sophia: Bride of God". I highly recomend it!
I still haven't given up on Wicca. I find that there are many places yet to explore within this tradition. I do however get frustrated with the public perception of Wicca (often encouraged by "wiccans"!). Most Wiccan materials out there would be good for little more than kindling at a ritual bonfire.
I'm still looking for sources on "Sophianic Gnosticism". As for Wicca, the best books I've encountered are "Wicca 333" by Kaatryn Macmorgan and "Triumph of the Moon" by Ronald Hutton.
Any suggestions from your end?
I do like "Gnostic Witch", but I think you should capitalize, I'm weird about stuff like that.
As for "Sophianic Gnosticism" - well my personal bias is that it ultimately describes the entire Western Mystery Tradition: in the service of Holy Wisdom.
When I speak of "Gnostic Christianity" I mean just that, and when I speak of "Gnosticism" I mean the distinct Sophianic/Hermetic religion rooted in the Mystery Schools, flowing through the Cathars, and through the Restoration movements of Fabé-Palaprat and Doinel.
Stay tuned for a big ole post about Sophia, and why I am a Sophianic Gnostic
Hey Dawn! I'm very interested in publishing books to counter the "pre-canned" version of paperback Wicca that's out there today by developing a deeper theology for Wicca, and reaching out to those interested so they will know the TRUTH and not be swayed by paper-back Wicca and it's embarassing New Age claims. I am a syncretist (I prefer that word better than eclectic, because eclectic nowadays tends to be associated with, basically, jacking staff from other religions which IS disrespectful), not a "Traditional", but I have been fighting for a while arguing that we can save the Mysteries by a deeper theology and we don't NEED a hardcore "Traditional" coven format. Feel free to contact me at JediSith725@aol.com it'd be great to talk to people of the same interest.
Natural blessings,
Obsidian Lightflame
Interesting post, great discussion.
It seems to me that the Middle/Neo-Platonic philosophic teachings, are key to disentangling the inter-relationships between Wicca and other Western traditions, and Gnosticism.
Iamblichus, a Pagan Neo-Platonist Theurgist, speaks of some technicalities of ritual, that unlock a bit of this, I think. Calling some gods or other beings, at certain times, under certain conditions, can result in an undesirable result (in Gnostic terms, attracting an Archon or other cosmic ignorant consciousness); the point of Neo-Platonic (Plotinian) contemplation is to orient the individusoul soul towards the totality of the World Soul, and to orient further towards the fruit of the World Soul gazing towards the Divine Mind/Nous/Intellectual Faculty (in Gnostic terms, the Divine Fullness that flows from Barbelo), which in turn gazes at The Good.
Many Gnostics were Middle Platonists.
Key Gnostic teachings urge us to make spiritual distinctions and to orient towards healing and grace, being cautious of interference by ignorance or an abusive ruler-mindset.
There are elements of Hermeticism, Wicca, etc., that are conducive to this sort of thing, and this helps form a bridge with classic, distinctive Gnostic texts.
Mathers, Crowley, Gardner, Waite, and others, were influenced by Plato, Plotinus, and Iamblichus, either directly or indirectly, as these are extremely important to Western Traditions as a whole.
Gnostic teachings about male-female Aeon pairs, and about Achamoth and Zoe, can really resonate with some of Wiccans, especially with some creative Middle/Neo-Platonic Pagan elaborations.
That this world is stamped in the image of higher realms, that things in lower realms have correspondences in higher layers of spiritual reality, allows for a sort of translation of Gnostic themes into Wiccan theology to some extent.
There are certainly things in Platonism and Gnosticism that can be translated into Wiccan-resonant terms.
There are things in Platonic (especially Middle/Neo-Platonic) theurgy, ethics, and contemplative practice on nature, that really fit well with Wicca, and may help to bridge it to Gnosticism. That's because Plotinus for example, was dualist and made stark distinctions between the ignorance of this world and its evils, etc., yet he discussed how contemplation of nature could orient the individual soul to the composite world soul and up towards The Good, and his students practiced practical magick as well as theurgy, and again, there were quite a few Gnostics who apparently hung out with Platonists.
Distinctive Gnostic teachings emphasize the dangers and the horrible consequences of ignorance and evil in this world, portraying this world as a dangerous place, urging people to be spiritual instead of worldly. Such language will be a sticking point for many Wiccans and others.
But it is good for there to be a dialog, especially because on a lot of things, there are overlapping sentiments and teachings, and some things that can flesh out theological issues, in sorting all of this out.
I do not use the term 'gnostic' to refer to modernized interpretations that stray far from the classic texts, and I think the controversial teachings are an important part of Gnostic tradition, and so I expect many Wiccans, etc., to be unwilling to fully identify with Gnosticism.
But on those sentiments and teachings where we may either agree or have some appreciation, we can explore and perhaps learn or grow, as we walk our individual paths.
It seems to me that if someone is able to emphasize gods/goddesses of Wisdom, and entities that are associated with goodness and spirituality, as a Wiccan (or what-have-you), and if they are able to appreciate and utilize dualist teachings like those in the Apocryphon of John, Ptolemey's letter to Flora, Iamblichus' theurgy or Plotinus Enneads, or Plato's Timaeus, then they may be quite a bit like some old-school Gnostics or rather close cousins. Theological/ philosophical/ esoteric fellow-travellers or friendly acquaintances at least.
To build upon the deep Western roots of Wicca, which its founders were either well aware of, or which they absorbed by osmosis, can strengthen Wicca so that it incorporates more of the wisdom of ancient Philosophy that is not inconsistent with it.
Classic Gnostic thought is very much at odds, however, with the notions of many Wiccans. There may be some room due to ecclecticism, but Wiccan traditionalists would protest at a form of Wicca that was Gnostic in an 'old-school' way, much the same as Plotinus and Celsus criticized Gnostics (including Gnostic Platonists) of their time.
you guys.. `amused` masons/satanist have alot in common.. what proof of things do you need really? it exists - and we aren't to play with it. witchcraft is as the sin of rebellion.. because it's power does not come from God. Baal's Fire - and 9/11.. think about things, yo :)
if you cant see satan's control of the world after you really understand masonic symbology...
Thank you, Anonymous, for your deeply articulate and insightful comments.
Um, yo.
Post a Comment